论文部分内容阅读
本文通过对戊戌维新运动和清末新政运动兴起的原因、改革的首要问题、以及两次立宪的考察，认为两次改革的内容基本是相同的，但其成效，后者却大大超过了前者，是中国近代史上最活跃、发展最快的时期之一。然而，有的论者却认为戊戌维新运动是进步的，清末新政是反动的。文章认为，必须克服以“阶级斗争为纲”的指导思想和方法，才能对历史事件的研究作出实事求是的评价。
This article through the Reform Movement of 1898 and the rise of the New Deal Movement in late Qing Dynasty, the primary issue of reform, as well as the two constitutional investigations, that the content of the two reforms are basically the same, but the effect, which latter greatly exceeded the former, is One of the most dynamic and fastest-growing period in modern Chinese history. However, some commentators think that the Reform Movement of 1898 made progress and that the New Deal in the late Qing Dynasty was reactionary. The article holds that we must overcome the guiding ideology and method of “class struggle as the key link” in order to make a realistic assessment of the historical events.