作为强力个性的批评家,哈罗德·布鲁姆常常被视为解构主义批评家。从这一意义上来说,沃尔海姆的“补救”批评观就相对温和一些。他的这一观点主要体现在《批评作为补救》一文中。本文通过简析沃尔海姆的“补救观”兼及对二者进行比较,以期开拓互文性批评观研究的新视野。 Harold Bloom, as a critically acclaimed personality, is often seen as a deconstructionist critic. In this sense, Walheim’s “remedy” criticism is relatively mild. His view is mainly reflected in the article “Criticism as a Remedy.” By analyzing Walheim ’s concept of “recuperation” and comparing the two, this article aims to open up a new horizon of intertextual criticism.