王輝先生整理的《儀禮注疏》有值得商榷之處。其中《士冠禮》篇,因爲没有參校日本學者倉石武四郎的《儀禮疏考正》,致有失校處112條;破句、引號失誤、書名號失誤、頓號失誤、專名號失誤、將訓詁句誤作叙述句等五類標點失誤46條。文章按類逐頁逐條對這些校點失誤加以分析。 Mr. Wang Hui finishing the “Ritual Note Shu” is debatable. Among them, “Shi Guan Li”, because there is no attendance at the Japanese scholar Cushishi Wu Shiro’s “ritual sparse positive test”, resulting in 112 defraud; broken sentence, quotation marks mistakes, the book name error, comma error, Misconduct sentence mistakes for narrative sentences and other five types of punctuation 46. The article class by page by page one by one on the mistakes of these schools to be analyzed.