《周末》1997年7月11日有篇消息摘要题为《只因同姓 竟被视作“同姓恋”诉上公堂 一对“鸳鸯”始成婚》。“同性恋”这个词,众所周知;但“同姓恋”的提法,我却没听到过,这篇摘要也就不能不看。可这文章题目看了使人糊涂。问题出在“竟被视作‘同姓恋’”一行字上。 何谓“视作”,该词条辞书未收,但其义不难界定,即“实际不是某人某物某事而被作为某人某物某事来 Weekend on July 11, 1997 An article digest entitled “Only because of the same name was actually regarded as” homosexual love “to the court to a” mandarin duck “first marriage.” The word “homosexuality” is well known; but the reference to “homosexual love” has not been heard before, and the abstract can not help but see. This article title can be confused. The problem lies in the words of “actually being treated as homosexuals”. What is “deemed as”, the term dictionaries did not receive, but the meaning is not difficult to define, that is "something that is not actually something