论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较研究两种采血方法应用于血常规检验时的临床结果。方法:选取来广州黄花岗街社区卫生服务中心接受血常规检验的受检者400例,将其随机分为两组,Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组各有200例,分别采集受检者的末梢血和静脉血进行检验,对两组受检者各项血常规检查指标的检查结果进行比较。结果:比较两组受检者在不同采血方式下各项血常规指标检测结果,可见Ⅱ组受检者的血红蛋白(Hb)、红细胞计数(RBC)、血小板计数(PLT)、红细胞压积(Hct)等指标显著高于Ⅰ组,而WBC则显著低于Ⅰ组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。其余三项指标平均红细胞平均体积(MCV)、红细胞平均血红蛋白含量(MCH)、红细胞平均血红蛋白浓度(MCHC)的比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在血常规临床检验时,不同采血方法获得的标本检验结果有所不同,相对而言,静脉血采血获得的检验结果更为准确。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical results of two blood sampling methods used in blood tests. Methods: Four hundred and seventy subjects who received routine blood test from Community Health Service Center of Guangzhou Huanghuagang Street were selected and randomly divided into two groups. There were 200 cases in group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ, and the peripheral blood and Venous blood test, the two groups of subjects to check the blood test results were compared. Results: The blood test results of two groups of subjects under different blood sampling methods were compared. The results showed that the hemoglobin (Hb), red blood cell count (RBC), platelet count (PLT), hematocrit (Hct) ) And other indicators were significantly higher than the group Ⅰ, while WBC was significantly lower than the group Ⅰ, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). There was no significant difference between the other three indicators of the average volume of red blood cells (MCV), average hemoglobin content (MCH), and average hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) of erythrocytes (P> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the blood routine clinical tests, the results obtained by different blood sampling methods are different, and the blood test results obtained by venous blood sampling are more accurate.