林微音的创作成就毕竟有限,关于他的文章已经有过好几篇了,再絮叨未免有过。然而我明知而故“过”,是因为今年出版的施蛰存先生的文集《沙上的脚迹》,其中《林微音其人》一篇有文字涉及到我。施老的那节文字是: 林微音和林徽因这两个人常常有人弄不清楚。一月十九日《文汇读书周报》曾有陈 学勇的一篇文章,为二林作了区引,纠正了杨义著《中国现代小说史》中的错误。但是, 该文中说上海的林微音曾“在《语丝》上登稿”,这一句恐怕还有问题。在北京出版的《语 丝》上,不会有上海林微音的文章。只有在上海出版的《语丝》,才可能有林微音的文章。 这里必须关区别两”、《语丝》。 施老的文章写在一九九一年,我近日才从他的文集中见到。施老的推断很有道理,林微音确实不会到北京的《语丝》上发表文章。不过,上海的《语丝》与北京的那个原本是一家,似不必过于认真地加以区别。由于北京“语丝派”批判社会的锋芒触怒了奉系军阀,因而一九 Lin Weilin’s creative achievements, after all, is limited, about his article has had several articles, then over again. However, I know that “excessive” is due to the fact that this year’s edition of Mr. Shi Zhecun’s essay “Footprints on the Sand,” one of which contains a text related to me. Elder that section of the text is: Lin Weinin and Lin Huiyin two people often get confused. On January 19, Wen Wei-Shu Weekly published an article by Chen Xue-Yong, making a reference to Erin and correcting Errors in Yang Yi’s “History of Modern Chinese Fiction.” However, the article said Shanghai’s Lin Weinin had “published” in “Yu Si”, I am afraid there is still a problem. Published in Beijing, “language silk”, there will be no articles of Shanghai Hailin. Only published in Shanghai, “Yu Si”, it may be Lin Phonetic articles. Here must be the difference between the two “,” language silk. “Shi Lao’s article was written in 1991, I recently seen from his essay .Stey’s presumption is very reasonable, Lin did not really listen to Beijing’s ”Yu Si“ published an article.However, Shanghai’s ”Yu Si“ and Beijing’s original one may not seem too different from distinguishing.Because Beijing ”Yu Si School" criticized the edge of society angered the Fengxian warlords , So one nine