论文部分内容阅读
《黑龙江民族丛刊》1987年第4期刊有国忠、呼和两同志的《东夏史事考辨》一文。该文博采文献资料,充分利用近年考古新成果,精心考证,解决了东夏史研究中的一些疑难问题,读后获益匪浅。不过,又感到有的问题尚需进一步探讨,现提出一、二,与国忠、呼和同志商榷。一、关于蒲鲜万奴军是否“通入海岛”问题《考辨》一文认为,《元史·木华黎传》所谓丙子年(1216年)蒲鲜万奴“率众十余万,遁入海岛”系“传闻之辞”,“不足凭信”;又说,屠寄在其所著《蒙兀儿史记·蒲鲜
“Heilongjiang ethnic series” in 1987 the fourth issue of Guozhong, call and two comrades “Dong Xia Historical Matter Identification,” a text. This literary collection of literature and information, make full use of new archaeological achievements in recent years, careful research, to solve some of the difficult problems in the study of the East Xia Dynasty, benefited a lot from reading. However, there are still some issues that we still need to explore further. Now, we will propose one or two issues to discuss with Comrades Zhong, Hu and He. First, on Pu Xian Wan slave whether the “access to the island” issue “examination” one article that “the Yuan Shih Muah Li Biography” So-called Bing Zi years (1216 years Pu Xian Wan slaves, “the rate of more than ten million, escape Into the island ”Department“ rumors ”,“ inadequate with the letter ”; also said that in his book," Mugwondo records Pu Xian