论文部分内容阅读
案件过程一审败诉2001年8月6日～2002年11月21日二审再败2002年12月27日～2003年1月30日三审胜诉2005年7月11日～2005年9月16日争议焦点：哪份遗嘱是真的这宗争产案争拗点在于龚如心和王廷歆向法庭呈交的遗嘱,何者才属于王德辉的最后遗嘱。据称,王德辉曾在1968年立下遗嘱,指遗产由父亲王廷歆继承。王廷歆在王德辉失踪超过7年后,于1997年向香港高等法院入禀,要求颁令王德辉法律上死亡,以及确认遗嘱,继承财产。不过,遗嘱却闹出“双胞胎”：龚如心在法庭上另行出示宣称王德辉在1990年所立的遗嘱,内容称王德辉所有的遗产均要留给他的妻子龚如心。案件在香港高院原讼庭审讯,持续171日,双方均聘请笔迹专家鉴定笔迹,创下香港史上聆讯时间最长的民事官司纪录,但龚如心被裁定遗嘱属伪造,被判败诉。龚如心不服判决,提出上诉。去年上诉庭再次裁定袭如心所提供的王德辉签名
The first instance case of the case lodged from August 6, 2001 to November 21, 2002, the second instance was defeated December 27, 2002 to January 30, 2003 The Third Trial Winning July 11, 2005 to September 16, 2005 Disputes Focus: which testament is true The dispute over this case is that Gong Ruxin and Wang Tingxin submitted to the court will, which belongs to Wang Dechui’s last will. Allegedly, Wang Dehui made a will in 1968, referring to inheritance inherited by his father Wang Ting Xin. Wang Tingxin filed a petition with the High Court of Hong Kong in 1997 after more than seven years of disappearance of Wang Dehui and demanded that Wang Dehui be legally allowed to die and confirm his will and inherit property. However, the testament turned out to be “twins”: Gong Ruxin also separately produced a will in the court alleging that Wang Dehui was established in 1990, saying that all the estate of Wang Dehui should be left to his wife Gong Ruxin. The trial of the case was held in Hong Kong High Court in the trial of the First Instance for 171 days. Both employ handwriting handwriting experts to mark the longest civil hearing in Hong Kong. However, Gong Ruxin was convicted of defending the will and losing the case. Gong Ruxin refused to accept the verdict and filed an appeal. Last year, the Court of Appeal ruled again that the heart-struck Wang Dehui’s signature