梁启超,是我国近现代史上一位颇有特色、亦颇有争议的人物。他不仅以著述众多而闻名,更以善于变化而著称。他一生思想变动频繁,令人目不暇接。所以,他的老师康有为称他是“流质易变”;同时代的革命党人则斥其为“首鼠两端”、“蝙蝠小人”;至于后来的史家,则既有人贬之为阴险狡诈、“风派人物”,也有人称赞他是顺应时势的爱国名家。但综观各家的议论,其核心问题无外乎这样三个:即“流质易变”的原因;“流质易变”中不变之因素;“流质易变”的评价。本文无意于开拓新的议论话题,只是想在这三个老问题上下点功夫,以求有助于客观公正地评价梁启超。 Liang Qichao is a rather characteristic and controversial figure in our country’s modern history. Not only is he famous for his numerous writings, he is famous for his change. His thoughts change frequently, dizzying. Therefore, his teacher Kang Youwei called him “a fluid fluidity”; contemporary revolutionaries dismissed him as “the first mouse at both ends” and “the batman”; as for later historians, both were relegated to insidious Cunning, “style of the wind”, some people praise him as a patriotic masters of the times. However, when we look at the discussion of each family, there are three core issues: the reason of “fluidity changeable”; the constant change of “liquidity changeable”; the evaluation of “fluidity changeable”. This article is not intended to open up new topics for discussion. Instead, I just want to devote some effort to these three old issues so as to help objectively and fairly evaluate Liang Qichao.