也许有人说 argument 有什么难写的,不就是找逻辑错误么?那么多错误,随便找3个就行了,简单得很。但是,必须注意的是,argument 不单单是要你找逻辑错误,内在的要求是你自己的文章也要很具有逻辑性,须先抓住最重要的逻辑问题。什么叫很具有逻辑性?就是你文章的组织,段与段之间的关系。逻辑错误应该从大到小,而不是简单地先到先排。希望读者在看过这篇分析后,能对 GRE 的 argument 有个全新的理解。 Maybe someone said that the argument is hard to write, isn’t it looking for logic errors? So many mistakes, just find 3 on the list, and it’s easy. However, it must be noted that the argument is not just for you to find logic errors, the internal requirement is that your own articles should also be logical, and you must first seize the most important logical issues. What is very logical? It is the relationship between the organization, paragraphs and paragraphs of your articles. Logical mistakes should go from big to small rather than simply first. I hope readers have a fresh understanding of GRE’s argument after reading this analysis.