论文部分内容阅读
指出将SCI作为科研成果评价工具时应注意的一些问题:运用比例数据进行纵向比较;合理编制检索式,保证数据准确性;在短时间内确定被引频次区域节点的阈值并完成统计;为避免学科差异,需要分学科领域进行评价工作;以大样本量抽样统计保障评价结论准确度;明确评价的引导作用不会导致SCI论文的快速增加,防止SCI的适用范围扩大化、评价结果简单化问题的出现。
The paper points out some problems that should be noticed when using SCI as the evaluation tool of scientific research achievements: making longitudinal comparison by using proportional data; formulating the search formula reasonably to ensure the accuracy of data; determining the threshold of nodes in the cited frequency sub-region in short time and completing the statistics; Disciplinary differences need to be evaluated in different disciplines. Sampling statistics are used to ensure the accuracy of evaluation conclusions. A clear guideline of evaluation will not lead to the rapid increase of SCI papers, to prevent SCI from expanding, and to simplify the evaluation results. The emergence of.