论文部分内容阅读
“法无明文规定不为罪,法无明文规定不处罚。”而由于现实发展的多样性及不可测性,使得法律的制定有一定的滞后性,此时,在实际操作中,出现法无明文规定的情况,主要依靠法官的自由裁量权来进行量刑。出现了法官在行使自由裁量权时与罪刑法定原则有失衡之处,引起了社会评论的很大争议。本文将对法官自由裁量权行使与罪刑法定原则适用中存在的问题进行分析,并对法官自由裁量权与罪刑法定原则在刑事司法实践中的平衡进行探讨,以期对刑事司法实践有所裨益。
“The law does not expressly provide for no offense, the law does not expressly provide no punishment. ” And because of the diversity of the reality and unpredictability, making the formulation of the law has a certain lag, this time in the actual operation, there The law does not expressly provide for the situation, mainly rely on the discretion of the judge to carry out the sentencing. There is a place where the judges have an imbalance with the principle of legality when exercising their discretion, causing great controversy in the social commentary. This article analyzes the problems existing in the exercise of the discretion of judges and the application of the statutory principle of crime and punishment, and discusses the balance between the discretion of judges and the legal principle of crime and penalty in the practice of criminal justice in the hope of benefiting criminal justice practice.