●主持人话语:当体量巨大、传播广泛的网络创作与风生水起、备受关注的网络文学批评一道走进人们的视野,史学反思就成为网络文学研究观念蓄势与学理生成不可或缺的思辨立场。基于此,网络文学批评能否入史、如何写史,就不再是一个虚设命题,而是一个期待理论逻辑延伸的有效言说。本组的几篇文章就是基于这样的学术背景所做的初步探索。欧阳友权《网络文学批评史的建构逻辑》一文认为,网络文学批评能否“入史”要取决于其在这个时代文化语境中的功能作用、它自身的发展水平,以及对其史学依据合法性的观念体认,以此确认建构网络 ● Moderator’s discourse: When the huge amount of mass, extensive network creation and the rise and fall, the attention of the network literary criticism into people’s horizons, the history of reflection has become a network of literary research ideas and potential students become indispensable Lack of speculative position. Based on this, whether online literary criticism can enter history or how to write history is no longer a hypothetical proposition, but an effective statement of the logical extension of the theory. Several articles in this group are based on this academic background to do a preliminary exploration. Ouyang Youquan’s “The Logic of Constructing the History of Internet Literary Criticism” holds that whether online literary criticism can “enter history” depends on its function and function in the cultural context of this era, its own level of development, History is based on the concept of legitimacy, in order to confirm the construction of the network