对于督促程序中的债务人异议,可以分两类情形区别对待。支付令申请受理要件是程序性要件,对这类要件的异议,法院应当依职权进行全面审查;支付令申请成立要件是实体性要件,对这类要件的异议,在督促程序中只需进行初步(表面合理性的)审查。尽管对后一种要件的审查相对宽松,但通过与普通程序的衔接,仍然可以达到控制债务人滥用异议权的效果。 To urge the debtor in the procedure to disagree, the situation can be treated differently. The application of the payment order is the procedural requirement, and the objection of such an objection should be subject to full review by the court. The application of the establishment of the payment order is a substantive requirement. Objections to such requirements only need to be preliminary (Surface justification) review. Although the review of the latter element is relatively lenient, the effect of controlling the debtor’s abuse of the right of objection can still be achieved through its interface with the ordinary procedure.