论文部分内容阅读
本刊从2009年第3期开始连载了《柴油机坦克与燃气轮机坦克优劣剖析》这篇长文,至本期全部刊登完毕。本文主要介绍柴油机型坦克的拥护者——俄罗斯乌拉尔运输车辆制造厂设计局专家的观点,内容十分广泛,包括了坦克的速度、动力装置的单位体积功率、坦克的单位功率与机动性、发动机燃油经济性、发动机加速性和适应性、动力装置的热工况、发动机的耐用性、动力装置的类型与可保养性、动力装置的可维修性、坦克与发动机的价格、装甲战车家族底盘的选择、坦克空中机动性、燃气轮机是否是未来坦克的动力、坦克改进升级的费效比以及坦克柴油机的未来发展等。俄罗斯专家认为在坦克业发展方向题上发生争论是不可避免的,这种争论也是坦克研制者和坦克兵的职责之一,对领导机关正确决策出台也是有益的,深切期望讨论应该有充分的论据和客观文献的有力支撑,本刊发表此文的初衷正在于此。
Articles published from 2009 No. 3 serialized “diesel tank and gas turbine tank analysis of advantages and disadvantages,” this long article, to the current issue of all published. This article focuses on diesel-type tank proponents - Russia Ural transport vehicle manufacturers Design Bureau experts point of view, a wide range of content, including the tank speed, power unit volumetric power unit, tank unit power and mobility, the engine fuel Economy, acceleration and adaptability of the engine, thermal conditions of the power plant, durability of the engine, type and maintainability of the power plant, maintainability of the power plant, price of tank and engine, Options, tank mobility in the air, whether the gas turbine is the engine of future tanks, the cost-effectiveness of tank upgrades, and the future development of tank diesel engines. It is inevitable for Russian experts to argue that the direction of the development of the tank industry is an issue. This kind of dispute is also one of the duties of the tank developers and tank soldiers. It is also beneficial to the correct decision-making by leading organs. It is highly desirable that the discussion should have sufficient arguments and The strong support of objective literature, this article is published in the original intention of this article.