全国人民代表大会常务委员会要向全国人民代表大会提交工作报告供代表审决,代表们依据什么来评判该报告则是宪法实践中必需解答的问题。如果认定代表的评判标准与工作报告起草依据同根同源,那么显然不能将常委会上一年度工作报告作为基准;因为计划做什么是对象而不是依据。判断常委会一年工作的标准只有一个,就是《宪法》第67等条文意旨。按照这些规范来论断常委会四个报告,结论是它实际所做的与宪法规定职责有差异。需要改正工作目标对宪法的偏移,使报告尽可能符合宪法要求。 The Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress will submit a working report to the National People’s Congress for the representatives to decide. The basis on which the deputies should judge the report is an issue that must be answered in the constitutional practice. If it is found that the criteria for judging a representative are identical to the basis for drafting the work report, it is obviously not possible to benchmark the work report of the previous year of the Standing Committee because the plan is to be the object rather than the basis. There is only one standard for judging the work of the Standing Committee one year, which is the meaning of Article 67 of the Constitution. In accordance with these norms, the four reports of the Standing Committee are concluded. It concludes that there is a discrepancy between the actual and constitutional responsibilities. There is a need to correct the deviation of the objectives of the Constitution from the Constitution so that the report meets the constitutional requirements as much as possible.