论文部分内容阅读
本文根据2009年高考政治(上海卷)考试结果,对试题进行功能偏差分析。分析对象包括两类,男女生子群体和市区、郊区考生子群体。分析结果显示,试题对市区、郊区考生子群体没有显著的功能差异。有两道试题存在功能偏差,对男生子群体有利,偏差效应总计不超过0.5分。两道试题的功能偏差来源各不相同,一是源自男、女生子群体思维品质差异,另一则受到与学科无关的背景知识的影响。政治考试(上海卷)对研究的子群体没有产生显著的不公平。但偏差来源分析揭示的信息,值得命题者反思和汲取教训。
This article according to 2009 college entrance examination politics (Shanghai volume) examination result, carries on the function deviation analysis to the test question. Analysis includes two categories, boys and girls groups and urban and suburban candidates group. The analysis results show that the test questions do not have significant functional differences in the urban and suburban candidates. There are two questions in the functional deviation, the male sub-groups benefit, the bias effect does not exceed 0.5 points. The deviations of the functional deviations of the two exams vary from one to the other because of differences in the thinking qualities of the male and female child groups and the influence of background knowledge unrelated to the subject. The Political Examination (Shanghai Vol.) Did not produce significant inequities in the subgroups studied. However, the information revealed by the analysis of source bias is worth the reflections and lessons learned by the proponents.