拙文《云南茶史考误》文成,送多位师友请教,得到很多有益的指点;后由《普洱》杂志选登两节,又得到一些肯定,也不乏批评、商榷。文章千古事,岂敢自以为是?但或许是因为拙文原有二万五千多字,而读者从《普洱》所见仅为其中两节不足万字,批评或商榷之文明显有一些似是而非之处, My article, “Yunnan Tea History Error” Wencheng, sent a number of mentors, get a lot of useful advice; after the “Puer” magazine selected two sections, but also to some affirmation, there is no lack of criticism, discussion. However, perhaps it is because there are more than 25,000 words in the original essay, and what readers see from Pu’er is only two of them in less than ten thousand words. There is some paradox in the text of criticism or discussion,