论文部分内容阅读
我们知道,西方哲学从古希腊的赫拉克利特直到黑格尔,贯穿着一条“逻各斯主义”的传统,体现出对语言及其逻辑关系的高度重视(“逻各斯”一词的本义即是语言、话语);相形之下,中国古代哲学却一开始就采取了蔑视和放弃语言本身的态度,从未把语言当作人与世界本体之间的必经中介,更不是将语言本身及其逻辑当作本体和客观规律。这一方面使中国哲学传统中包含着丰富的辩证思维因素,但另一方面也使这些因素停留在原始朴素的水平,无法上升到辩证逻辑的高度。本文想就与此相关的几个最重要的中国哲学范畴对此作一点分析。
We know that Western philosophy runs from Heraclitus in ancient Greece to Hegel through a tradition of “logosism,” which shows the great importance attached to language and its logical relationship (“logos” The original meaning is language, discourse). By contrast, ancient Chinese philosophy, from the very beginning, took the attitude of contempt and abandonment of the language itself and never regarded language as a necessary intermediary between man and the world ontology, Itself and its logic as the noumenon and the objective law. On the one hand, the Chinese philosophical tradition contains abundant elements of dialectical thinking, but on the other hand, these elements are left at primitive simplicity and can not rise to the level of dialectical logic. This article is intended to give some analysis of several of the most important Chinese philosophical categories related to this.