一本学报,无论其学术质量,还是编校出版质量,总是以整体的面目出现而为读者接受的,而编辑工作的性质,决定了学报整体又是由分头独立完成的各个部分组成的。完成部分工作的编辑个体对质量要求的理解或把握总是参差不齐的。所以,主编的整体把关作用就成了客观需要,主编把关整体质量的作为可从如下方面得以体现。 大学学报的质量是一种综合体现,有政治要求、有学术质量、有编校质量,也有出版印刷质量。除政治要求外,主编必须结合本刊的实际情况来制订学术、编校、出版等质量目标。如根据国家科委关于《科技期刊学术类评估标准》,刊出论文属国家和省、部级基金资助项目的比例要求,优秀为超过40％,相当一部分大学学报做不到。即使一些知名度较高的学校,若学报的综合影响没有上来,短期也难于达到这一目标。若一味追求,势必事与愿违。结果是一般稿件吓跑了,重点稿件又吸引不住。1995年全国高校自然科学学报评比颁奖会上,不少大学代表感叹好稿件留不住,其中不乏这类原因。任何事物的发展都有一个过程。写一般稿件的作者,经过科研工作的起步、研究深入,也会争取到基金的资助,也会创作出高质量的稿件。主编的学术质量目标必须注意涵养稿源。又如在编校质量中执行科学规范达标,也绝不是一朝一夕可以解决的,除? A journal, regardless of its academic quality, or its quality, is always accepted by readers for its overall appearance. The nature of the editorial work determines that the journal as a whole consists of various parts that are separately and independently completed. Editors who complete part of their work always have different understandings or grasp of quality requirements. Therefore, the chief editor of the overall function of the gate has become an objective need, editor of the overall quality control as can be seen from the following aspects. The quality of university journals is a kind of integrated expression, with political requirements, academic quality, editorial quality, and published print quality. In addition to political requirements, the editor must be combined with the actual situation of this publication to develop academic, editing, publishing and other quality objectives. According to the State Science and Technology Commission on “academic journals Academic Evaluation Criteria”, published papers are national and provincial, ministerial-level fund-funded projects, the proportion of outstanding, more than 40%, a considerable part of the University Journal can not. Even in some well-known schools, it is difficult to achieve this goal in the short run if the comprehensive impact of the journal does not come up. If blindly pursue, it is bound to be contrary to expectations. The result is scared off the general manuscript, the key manuscript and could not attract. 1995 National College Natural Science Journal Award Presentation Conference, many university representatives lamented the good manuscript can not stay, many of these reasons. Everything has a process of development. The authors who write general manuscripts, after the start of scientific research work, in-depth research, will also win funding support from the fund and will also create high-quality manuscripts. Editor of the academic quality goals must pay attention to conservation sources. Another example is the quality of editing in the implementation of scientific norms compliance, nor by overnight can be resolved, except?