论文部分内容阅读
侵害他人债权是否构成侵权行为?这是民法学界长期争论的一个热门话题,债权侵权制度是近代债权制度与侵权制度发展的产物。它修正了大陆法的债权相对性和英美法合同相对性的传统法律观念,赋予债权以权利的不可侵性,藉此给予债权人以最周全而充分的保护。债权侵权制度有效地限制了债权债务人之外的第三人的民事行为,更加有效地保障了债权制度效用的充分发挥。本文着重从该制度的理论基础、法律实践上的渊源入手进行分析比较,并在此基础上,分析了第三人侵害债权制度的价值,由此引发对我国的相关立法和司法实践的一些思考。
Is it a tortuous act that infringes another’s creditor’s rights? This is a hot topic that the civil law scholars dispute over a long time. The creditor’s rights infringement system is the product of the development of modern creditor’s right system and infringement system. It amends the traditional legal concepts of the relativity of the civil law and the relativity of the Anglo-American law contract, and gives the creditor the inviolability of the right, thus giving the creditor the most comprehensive and adequate protection. The creditor’s rights infringement system effectively limits the civil behavior of the third party other than the creditor and debtor, and more effectively guarantees the full exertion of the utility of the creditor’s rights system. This article focuses on the theoretical basis of the system, the legal origin of the law to start the analysis and comparison, and on this basis, the analysis of the value of third party infringement claims system, which led to China’s relevant legislation and judicial practice of some thinking .