论文部分内容阅读
童教授前后两文的本意是提醒人们不要过度阐释物权的平等保护,并希望用释宪的方式消除平等保护违宪的嫌疑。不可以离开宪法理解民法的平等原则。民事主体资格之间的不同是宪法基本经济制度条款的直接反映,是最大的法律差别。指出平等保护原则与宪法基本经济制度条款有冲突是为了解决问题,不是为物权法的通过设置障碍。刑法上对不同主体的区别对待客观上是特殊保护。
Professor Tong’s intention before and after the two is to remind people not to over-explain the equal protection of property rights, and hope to use the constitutional interpretation of the way to eliminate the suspicion of equal protection of the unconstitutional. Can not leave the constitution to understand the principle of equality of civil law. The difference between civil subject qualifications is the direct reflection of the articles of the constitutional basic economic system and the largest legal difference. It points out that the principle of equal protection conflicts with the provisions of the basic economic system of the Constitution in order to solve the problem, instead of setting obstacles for the passage of the Property Law. The discrimination of different subjects in the criminal law is objectively a special protection.