论文部分内容阅读
在用阅读测验题测试考生的阅读能力时,所选择的阅读材料,一般都应该是文从字顺,合乎逻辑的。只有在为了达到特定的测试目的时,(如考查考生对某种错误的识别能力),才有意识地采用一些有毛病的阅读材料,或者更改阅读材料,故意制造一些缺漏。可是,我们看到,有些语文试题却选用了有毛病的阅读材料。这样的题目,不但影响考生的思考,而且对社会语文,也制造了混乱。下面分析几个典型例子。考题先当病句改有个大刊物举办一次语文竞赛,有一道题目,要求阅读下面的长句,然后答题。航空遥感,特别是航天遥感的发展,为地面大范围的勘测、找矿找水;为加速荒地、森
When reading quiz questions to test candidates’ reading ability, the reading materials chosen should generally be written in a straightforward and logical manner. Only in order to achieve a specific test purpose (such as examining a candidate’s ability to identify certain types of errors) can he consciously adopt some erroneous reading materials or change reading materials to deliberately create gaps. However, we have noticed that some language examination questions have used faulty reading materials. Such problems not only affect the candidates’ thinking but also create confusion in social languages. Here are some typical examples. The first exam questions were changed to a large publication to hold a language competition. There was a topic that required reading the following long sentences and then answering the questions. Aviation remote sensing, especially the development of space remote sensing, provides a wide range of surveys and prospecting for water on the ground; to accelerate wasteland and forests