通过上篇的比较描述我们不难发现,在批评界和作家圈内对于新历史小说的文本所指的观念差异竟是如此巨大。但是,假如我们抛开作家的理念仍然把它放在“历史主义”层面进行探讨,我们是否依然可以发现,即使该类小说存在瓦解颠覆历史的意识,它的存在仍然是一种现实选择的需要。 事实上,尽管新历史小说在文本目的所指层面的分析下证明了自身无意于冒犯历史,但其潜在的诸 It is not hard to see through the comparative description of the preceding article that the notion of differences in the texts of the new historical novels in the critics and writers circles is so great. However, if we ignore the writer’s conception and still discuss it at the “historicist” level, can we still find that even if such novels have a sense of disintegrating history, their existence is still a realistic choice Need. In fact, although new historical novels prove themselves unintentionally offensive to history at the level of the textual purpose, their potential