论文部分内容阅读
本文举例指出张家山汉简《二年律令》的讹误可分有标示的讹误与没标示的讹误。前者是书手出于某种目的,对书写体例的破坏。后者可进一步分为抄漏、误倒、补抄于后文等数种。补抄于后文是书手抄写受到监督、读者与书手非一人时才可能出现的现象。现藏于荆州博物馆的《二年律令》有可能是为了随葬而请书手另抄的明器,其祖本可能是墓主生前实用的法律文书。
The article points out that the corruption of Zhangjiashan Hanjian “two years law” can be divided into two kinds: corruption and unmarked corruption. The former is a hand book for some purpose, the destruction of the writing style. The latter can be further divided into a copy leak, mistake down, complement copy in later and so on. Complementary copy later in the book is under the supervision of hand-copied, readers and book hand when the phenomenon may occur. Now hidden in Jingzhou Museum’s “two-year law” may be buried for hand book another copy of the Ming, the ancestor may be the tomb of the practical legal instruments.