论文部分内容阅读
目的尝试综合评价各地突发公共卫生事件应急响应与处署总体水平,为量化评价提供依据。方法描述各地事件特征,应用TOPSIS法对福建省9个地市2010年监测报告的突发公共卫生事件涉及的5个指标进行综合效益评价,并进行质量优劣评定。结果 2010年福建省突发公共卫生事件共85起,总体泉州市位居第一,三明市位居末位。各地事件监测敏感性差异无统计学意义。与2009年相比,事件监测敏感性有较大降低。综合分析结果表明不同设区市总体效果存在差异,Ci值最高为0.57,最低为0.31,差异跨度3个等级。结论综合评价方法可以较好评估辖区内疾控机构监测、处置及管理突发公共卫生事件总体水平,结果客观,实用性强。
Objective To try to evaluate the overall emergency response and deployment level of public health emergencies in all parts of the country in order to provide the basis for quantitative evaluation. Methods The characteristics of events were described. The TOPSIS method was used to evaluate the comprehensive benefits of the five indicators involved in public health emergencies in the monitoring reports of 2010 in nine cities in Fujian Province and to evaluate the quality of the indicators. Results In 2010, there were 85 public health emergencies in Fujian Province, ranking first in Quanzhou City and Sanming City in last place. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity of incident monitoring across the country. Compared with 2009, the sensitivity of incident monitoring has been greatly reduced. The results of comprehensive analysis show that there are differences in the overall effectiveness of different districts and districts. The highest Ci value is 0.57, the lowest is 0.31, and the difference span is 3 grades. Conclusion The comprehensive evaluation method can better assess the overall level of CDC’s monitoring, handling and management of public health emergencies in the area of jurisdiction. The results are objective and practical.