我国原有的民事诉讼模式源于前苏联,是一种职权主义诉讼模式。随着20世纪80年代末各地法院审判方式改革的进行,不断地融人了当事人主义模式的一些内容,如强化当事人的举证责任,强化庭审功能,法官当庭认证和裁判案件。但由于缺乏相关配套制度的支持,引起了法官突袭性裁判,损害当事人利益的问题。对此问题的解决,笔者认为有赖于法官适时进行必要的心证公开。笔者现就实行心证公开的相关问题作以探讨。 China’s original model of civil litigation originated in the former Soviet Union, is a kind of power mode litigation. With the reform of the trial methods of courts around the end of the 1980s, some elements of the mode of party doctrine have been continuously merged, such as strengthening litigant’s burden of proof, strengthening the trial function, attending the court trial and adjudicating cases. However, due to the lack of supporting systems, it has aroused the judge’s aggressive referee and damaged the interests of the parties. To solve this problem, I think it depends on the judge timely disclosure of the necessary evidence. The author now on the implementation of the evidence-related issues for discussion.