“逆产”一词于文献明确提出并单独使用最早当在明代。其源流可追溯至战国时反逆罪者财产。清承明制,“逆产”为叛逆者财产,查抄叛逆者田产入官成为定例。辛亥至抗战前,“逆产”指向卖国军阀、反动分子、贪官污吏、土豪劣绅财产。抗战时期与战后之初,“逆产”主要指汉奸产业。解放战争与建国初期,“逆产”划分新旧两类,旧“逆产”为汉奸财产,新“逆产”为国民党军政人员、反动分子、恶霸、首要特务等人财产。由古而今,各代政权均将“逆产”界定、处置作为政权维系与政府威信树立重要手段,并将自身政治需求作为“逆产”诠释依据。所不同的是,伴随社会进步与法制观念增强,“逆产”处置与使用方式随之演进。“逆产”处置进步表现为人员籍没剔除、法制 The term “reverse birth ” was explicitly put forward in the literature and used alone as early as the Ming Dynasty. Its origins can be traced back to Warring States against anti-crime property. Qing Cheng Ming system, “reverse production ” as the property of the rebels, check rebel land into the official into the order. Before the war of resistance against Japan, Xinhai pointed to the soldier’s warlords, reactionaries, corrupt officials, local tyrants and evil gentry properties. During the war of resistance against Japan and the beginning of the war, “reverse production ” mainly refers to the traitor industry. The war of liberation and the early days of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, the new birth and death of the traitor, . From ancient times to the present, all generations of regimes have defined and treated “backward production” as an important means of maintaining the power and maintaining the prestige of the government, and regard their own political needs as the basis for their interpretation of “backward production.” The difference is that with the social progress and the concept of legal system to enhance, “reverse production ” approach and use of the evolution. “Reverse production ” The progress of the disposal of the performance of personnel not removed, the rule of law