论文部分内容阅读
在互联网高速发展的背景下,作为一种重要的通讯媒介,一国的互联网监管措施可能导致部分基本人权无法得到保障,过度的监管和不必要的限制措施均可能对个人隐私权造成损害。国际人权法授予国家在特定条件下对互联网人权自由予以限制的权利,但是由于各国意识形态和法律体系的差异,互联网监管措施必然存在差别性。扮演国际秩序“维护者”的美国在“斯诺登事件”爆发后,其互联网监控对个人数据的大量获取侵犯个人隐私权。为了更好的保障隐私权不被侵犯,各国有必要明确一国互联网监管措施的限度,在互联网监管的同时注重个人数据隐私的保护,不仅保护本国公民,更要禁止国家域外索取数据信息,维护国家主权和信息安全,承担国际人权法赋予国家的义务。
In the context of the rapid development of the Internet, as an important communication medium, a country’s Internet regulatory measures may lead to some basic human rights can not be guaranteed, excessive regulation and unnecessary restrictions may result in personal privacy damage. International human rights law gives the state the right to restrict the freedom of human rights on the Internet under certain conditions. However, because of the differences in ideology and legal system among different countries, there are bound to be differences in Internet regulatory measures. In the wake of the “Snowden Incident,” the United States, acting as an international order “defender ”, has seen its Internet monitor its acquisition of personal data in large quantities and violates the privacy rights of individuals. In order to better protect the right of privacy is not violated, all countries need to clarify the limits of a country’s Internet regulatory measures, Internet privacy protection at the same time pay attention to personal data, not only to protect their own citizens, but also to prohibit foreign countries to obtain data and information, maintenance National sovereignty and information security, and assume the obligations that state gives to nations under international human rights law.