论文部分内容阅读
关于革命历史画,在浙江的一个座谈会上曾听到金冶先生讲的看法与高照先生讲的几条,两位各有自己的侧重点(一个强调历史的客观具体性、真实性;一个强调作者今天对历史的主观评价与自我理解),因而各有不同的解释。我觉得先要分清一条界限,即:革命历史画与革命历史题材创作这两者之间的界限——它们其实并不完全是一个东西。前者,必须是以历史上的真人真事——真正存在过的历史人物与真正发生
Regarding revolutionary historical paintings, at a symposium in Zhejiang Province, he heard a few articles by Mr. Jin Ye on what Mr. Gao Zhaoyu said. Each of them has its own emphasis (one emphasizing the objective concreteness and authenticity of history; One emphasizing the author’s subjective evaluation of history and self-understanding today) and thus each has a different interpretation. I think we must first distinguish a line, namely: the boundary between the revolutionary history paintings and revolutionary historical themes - they are not exactly a thing. The former must be based on historical real events - the real historical figures and what really happened