论文部分内容阅读
第三人侵害债权制度极大地突破了传统民法理论中的债权相对性理论,引来了国内外学者的热议,一部分学者认为,该制度所能解决的问题用现有的法律制度即能解决,一部分学者则担心该制度的建立会导致现有法律体系的混乱。笔者认为,探讨第三人侵害债权制度是否具有存在的必要,首先需要了解制度的渊源和具体含义,其次进一步思考其存在的合理性。本文从应对学者们现有的疑惑切入,结合理论和实际,分析论证第三人侵害债权制度存在的合理性。
The system of third party infringement claims has greatly broken the theory of creditor’s rights relativity in the traditional civil law theory and attracted the hot arguments of scholars at home and abroad. Some scholars think that the problems that the system can solve can be solved by the existing legal system Some scholars worry that the establishment of this system will lead to the confusion of the existing legal system. In my opinion, to explore whether the third party infringes on the debt system is necessary, we must first understand the origin and specific meaning of the system, and secondly, think about the rationality of its existence. This article deals with the existing doubts of scholars and combines the theory and practice to analyze and prove the rationality of the existence of the third party infringement claims system.