论文部分内容阅读
众所周知,上世纪初叶在甘肃礼县出土的秦公簋,对先秦历史有着极为重要的研究价值。自从秦公簋面世后,许多学者对其作了考证,其中就有王国维、罗振玉、马叙伦、郭沫若、容庚、商承祚等大家,他们在秦公簋的器主和年代问题上,各主其说。影响较大的是郭沫若,他关于秦公簋的器主是秦景公的说法,已被学界作为权威性说法普遍接受。但陈泽先生在研究过程中却发现此说尚有漏洞,如把秦襄公的十二代子孙,说成十二代祖先,而且还漏算了一位静公。陈泽先生50年前是我在甘肃礼县上小学六年级时的老师,以后多年从事中学文史教育。礼县作为秦国
As we all know, the early Qin Dynasty unearthed in Li County in Gansu at the beginning of last century, Qin Gong, on the history of pre-Qin has an extremely important research value. Since the publication of Qin Gonglu, many scholars have made a research on it. Among them are Wang Guowei, Luo Zhenyu, Ma Xulun, Guo Moruo, Rong Geng, and Shang Chengtai, all of whom, on the subject and age of Qin Gong Lord said. The more influential is Guo Moruo. His argument about Qin Gonggong being Qin Jinggong has been universally accepted by the academic community as an authoritative statement. However, during the course of his research, Mr. Chen Ze found that there are still loopholes in his speech. For example, he described the twelve generations of Qin Xianggong as the ancestors of the twelfth generation, but also omitted one of the statutory public figures. Mr. Chen Ze 50 years ago, I was in Li County, Gansu primary school sixth grade teacher, after many years engaged in secondary education. Li County as Qin