论文部分内容阅读
对纳粹德国奥斯威辛集中营暴行以及其他战争罪的清算所确立的国际法规则,即关于违反和平罪、战争罪和反人类罪的战争责任认定,不仅具有重大的法律意义,而且具有深远的政治和伦理意义。它们在推动当代国际法律规则和国际关系实践的演变和革新的同时,也面临着现实的和理论的困境,这突出地表现为关于维护、促进和强制执行人权的国际规则及其引出的人道主义干涉所面临的两难。在分析现实主义%D多元主义和自由国际主义两种立场的基础上,引入正义战争理论,试图为调和主权原则、不干涉原则和不使用武力原则与人道主义干涉等武力使用之间的矛盾提供一种参照,进而在伦理意义上思考包括武力使用在内的战争与和平问题。
The rules of international law enshrined in the liquidation of the Auschwitz concentration camp in Nazi Germany and other war crimes, namely the war liability for violations of peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity, are not only of great legal significance but also far-reaching political And ethical significance. While pushing forward the evolution and reform of contemporary international legal rules and practice of international relations, they are also facing real and theoretical dilemmas, which are prominently manifested in the international rules concerning the safeguarding, promotion and enforcement of human rights and the humanitarianism they lead to Interference with the dilemma. On the basis of analyzing two standpoints of realism% D pluralism and liberal internationalism, this article introduces the theory of just war and tries to provide contradictions between the principle of non-interference and non-use of force and the use of force such as humanitarian intervention As a reference, and then ethically think about the issue of war and peace, including the use of force.