论文部分内容阅读
对托洛茨基如何评价,是当前国内外引人注目的一个问题。目前在对托洛茨基的评价问题上,存在着三种不同的意见。 一种是完全按照《苏联共产党(布)历史简明教程》所定的格调,把托洛茨基说成是叛徒、间谍和自卫杀人凶手,替德日法西斯效劳的奴仆和走狗。粉碎“四人帮”以后,我国也曾经出版过若干关于托洛茨基的小册子,基本上采取上述绝对否定的方针。1987年9月27日《苏维埃俄罗斯报》发表了历史学教授伊万诺夫的文章,阐述为什么不应该给托洛茨基平反。他说,布尔什维克党拒绝接受托洛茨基和托洛茨基主义,并且同他决裂,这是托洛
How to evaluate Trotsky is a conspicuous issue at home and abroad. At present, there are three different opinions on the evaluation of Trotsky. One is to follow exactly the style set forth in the concise history book of the Soviet Communist Party (Bolshevik) and to make Trotsky a traitor and a spy and a murderer of self-defense murderers and servants of Tethys fascism. After the smashing of the “Gang of Four,” our country has also published a number of brochures on Trotsky, basically adopting the above-mentioned principle of absolute negation. On September 27, 1987, “Soviet Russia Newspaper” published an article by history professor Ivanov, explaining why Truths should not be rehabilitated. He said that the Bolshevik Party refused to accept Trotsky and Trotskyism and broke with him. This is Tolo.