论文部分内容阅读
要求彻底改革人身伤害法的呼声将不会沉寂下去。最近在美国业已出版了两部力作。它们使外国人得以了解美国的改革和改革建议。获得经济学、哲学和法学学位的芝加哥教授里查得·加斯金斯出版了《环境事故:人身伤害和公共责任》(1989),另一位伯克利的法学教授斯蒂芬·休格曼出版了《废除人身伤害法:对受害者、用户、商业新的补偿机制》(1989)。这两本书都是向侵权法的法律家们传达美国改革侵权法新近压力的意蕴的重要工具。侵权法的缺陷两位作者的主旨是要进一步强调美国的侵权行为法体系严重地不能达到其两个主要的目的,即对反社会行为的惩戒和对受害者的补偿。侵权行为法原先并非旨在要建立一种一般的补偿体制。事实证明确实如此,因为不公平的补偿范围使许多受害者得不到补救;而使通过
The calls for a complete reform of the personal injury law will not go away. Two recent masterpieces have been published in the United States. They enable foreigners to understand the United States reform and reform proposals. Richard Gaskins, a professor of economics, philosophy and law in Chicago, published “Environmental Accident: Personal Injury and Public Responsibility” (1989). Another Berkeley law professor Stephen Hughman published “ Abolition of Personal Injury Act: Victim, User, Commercial New Compensation Mechanism ”(1989). Both of these books are important tools for conveying to lawyers in tort law the implications of the recent pressures on reform of tort law in the United States. Flaws in Tort Law The motto of both authors is to further emphasize that the system of tort law in the United States can not seriously meet its two main objectives of punishing antisocial behavior and compensating the victim. The tort law was not originally intended to establish a general compensation system. This proved to be the case because many victims were not remedied because of unfair compensation coverage;