论文部分内容阅读
机能主义刑法学不同于传统的刑法解释学,传统刑法解释学重视“体系思考”即注重法律逻辑的推演,而机能主义刑法学重视“问题思考”即注重刑法社会机能的实现,机能主义刑法学力图在刑法学研究中实现从“体系思考”到“问题思考”的转变。机能主义刑法学以经验主义认识论、社会工程学理论、目的论、价值相对主义等思想为前提,以刑法应该具有的机能为逻辑起点,从应然和实然两个方面对刑法中各个具体问题进行考察。由于机能主义刑法学更为关注刑法作为社会控制手段的机能的实现,因此容易轻视体系以及作为形式保障原则的罪刑法定原则的约束。
Functional law criminal law differs from traditional criminal law hermeneutics, traditional criminal law hermeneutics emphasis “system thinking ” that is, pay attention to the deduction of legal logic, while functional law criminal law emphasis “thinking of questions ” that is, pay attention to the realization of criminal law social function, Functionalism criminal law tries hard to realize the transformation from “system thinking” to “question thinking” in the study of criminal law. According to the theory of empiricist epistemology, social engineering theory, teleology and value relativism, functional criminal law of criminal law takes the function that the criminal law should have as the starting point of logic, and analyzes the concrete problems of the criminal law from the two aspects of the criminal law To inspect. As functionalist criminal law is more concerned with the realization of the function of criminal law as a means of social control, it is easy to underestimate the system and the legal principle of crime and punishment as the principle of formal security.