论文部分内容阅读
彩电商务部:商务部进出口公平贸易局负责人发表声明,对美国商务部11月24日做出中国彩电企业存在27.94%-78.45%不等倾销幅度的初裁结果再次表示严重关切。这位负责人表示,美方做出这个裁决结果不符合客观事实:中国彩电对美出口的贸易方式整体上以进料加工为主,且输美彩电成品的绝大部分料件都是从日本、美国等国家和地区进口,在此情况下,判定中国企业如此之高的倾销幅度非常令人不解,除非美方认定这些国家本身也正向中国倾销彩电部件。他说,在中国,彩电行业是市场化程度很高的产业,彩电企业的生产制造、销售等均是市场化运作,企业完全自主生产和经营并自由竞争。美方仍然继续选用印度做为“替代国”计算中国产品价格的做法不仅毫无道理,且不符合中国加入世贸组织议定书第十五条相关规定和WTO基本原则,是对中国企业严重歧视的不公正待遇。
Color TV Business Department: Ministry of Commerce Import and Export Fair Trade Bureau issued a statement on the United States Department of Commerce on November 24 to make the Chinese color TV enterprises there is a 27.94% -78.45% dumping margin ranging from the results of the preliminary reiteration of serious concern. The official said that the United States made the ruling results do not meet the objective fact: China’s color TV exports to the United States to trade as a whole to feed processing, and the vast majority of lost color TV finished products are from Japan, The United States and other countries and regions. Under such circumstances, it is quite puzzling to find such a high dumping margin for Chinese enterprises unless the United States finds that these countries themselves are dumping color TV sets in China. He said that in China, the color TV industry is a highly marketized industry. The manufacturing, sales, and so on of color TV enterprises are market-oriented. Enterprises are completely independent in their production and operation and are free to compete. The fact that the United States still continues to choose India as the “surrogate country” to calculate the prices of Chinese products is not only unreasonable and does not comply with the relevant provisions of Article 15 of the WTO accession protocol and the WTO’s basic principles and is a serious discrimination against Chinese enterprises Unfair treatment.