本雅明和庞德在翻译理论上都有精彩论述。在我看来,本雅明认为任何文本都是由有局限的语言书写而不是由一种想象之中的人人都懂的前巴别塔语言书写,因而存在瑕疵,这未免有失偏颇;庞德的理论认为义象(即文本的言语方面)几乎是不可译的,因而也存有缺陷。在本文中,我试图以多个更加重视译者的方式重新界定语言的透明性和模糊性,并以我所翻译的海涅诗歌为例进行了分析和论证。 Benjamin and Pound have brilliant discourses in translation theory. In my opinion, Benjamin’s belief that any text is written in a limited language rather than in a pre-Babel language that everybody in the imagination understands, and therefore flaws, is biased; The German theory holds that righteousness (that is, the verbal aspect of the text) is almost untranslatable and thus has its own shortcomings. In this article, I attempt to redefine the transparency and ambiguity of languages ​​in a number of ways that give more emphasis to translators. I analyze and prove Evidence from Heine’s poetry that I translate.