当代文体学对作品的分析不同于传统的文章评论.传统的文章评论一般以评论者主观感觉为主体,或联系到作品以外的因素;而现代文体学则是从作品表现出来的语言形式,用科学的方法,去阐发作者语言选择的动机,和这些选择对语义和感情的传达可能造成的影响,从语言形式的深层内涵来帮助读者对作品有更深一层的理解.文体学研究的内容很丰富,本文只打算从广义的角度,概括地谈谈名词对论说文的文体价值. The analysis of contemporary stylistics is different from the traditional article review. The traditional article review generally takes the subjective perception of the reviewer as the main body, or relates to factors other than the work; while the modern stylistics is the language form expressed from the work. The scientific method to interpret the motivation of the author’s choice of language, and the possible influence of these choices on the transmission of semantics and feelings, helps readers to have a deeper understanding of the works from the deeper connotation of the linguistic forms. The study of stylistics is very Rich, this article only intends to talk about the stylistic value of noun-to-essay articles in a broad sense.