论文部分内容阅读
编辑先生:近读《中国花卉盆景》2003年第6期59页之根艺《圣人》的简述,仿佛又回到了上个世纪50年代末那个浮夸风泛滥的年代。一个树根,经过加工,有一定欣赏价值。但并不具备什么“圣人”的显著特征。夸大的、不合适的评述不知能搏得多少人的赞赏?有几个人能够认同?作品赏评应恰如其分。恰当的评析和揭示能使读者更好地理解作品的内涵。同页的《苦斗》赏评就是个很好的例子。诚然,对同一事物各人可以有不同看法。要得到别人的认可不是靠吹嘘。过分的不切实际的赞扬,更易引起别人的反感。向以文风严谨、论事公正而深得读者信任的《中国花卉盆景》出现上述问题,
Editor: Recently read the “Chinese flower bonsai” 2003 the sixth period 59 pages of the root art “Sage” brief, as if back to the last century, the last century, the era of rhetorical rhetoric. A root, after processing, have some appreciation of value. But does not have what “Sage ” salient features. Exaggerated, inappropriate comments I do not know how many people can beat praise? Several people can agree? Works Appreciation should be appropriate. Appropriate analysis and disclosure can make readers better understand the content of the work. The same page “bitter struggle” review is a good example. Admittedly, each person can have a different opinion of the same thing. To get recognition of others is not by boasting. Excessive unrealistic praise, more likely to arouse the dislike of others. To the strict style of writing, fairness and won the trust of readers “Chinese flower bonsai” the above problems,