论文部分内容阅读
长期以来学界存在的以“时代性”为衡量中国哲学基本标准的理论立场,实根源于西方“现代性”理论的影响。此一理论立场确有其积极意义,但也容易得出在整体上否定中国哲学传统之现代价值的结论。这一主张隐含着以特定时期西方文化的民族性充任人类文化之时代性的理论内涵,轻忽乃至抹杀了非西方民族文化传统的超越性与继承性,并以将西方式现代性看作封闭而完备的价值系统为前提。为完成由主要关注“非西方文化如何彻底照搬西方”向更多地关注“如何集中多民族文化共同体的智慧以解决地球村的共同困限”这一“中心主题的置换”,必须摒弃机械地持守时代性之一维的僵硬思维模式,而从时代性与民族性两个维度对文化问题予以更完整的关照。
For a long time, the theoretical standpoint of “the times” as the basic standard for Chinese philosophy that exists in academia has its roots in the influence of Western “modernity” theory. This theoretical position does have its positive significance, but it is also easy to draw conclusions that generally negate the modern value of the Chinese philosophical tradition. This proposition implies that with the ethnicity of western culture as the historical connotation of human culture in a particular period, it neglects or even surmounts the transcendence and succession of the non-Western ethnic and cultural traditions and treats Western-style modernity as closed The complete value system as a precondition. In order to accomplish the “central theme replacement” of paying attention to “how to concentrate the wisdom of a multi-ethnic cultural community to solve the common difficulties of the global village” from the main concern of “how non-Western cultures completely copy the West,” we must abandon the principle of " Keep the one-dimensional rigid thinking mode of the time, and take a more complete consideration of the cultural issues from the two dimensions of the time and the nationality.