农民工王登辉在下班途中遭遇车祸,其所在企业却以王登辉违反“禁止员工擅自在外住宿”的规定为由,拒绝支付医药费。王登辉申请劳动仲裁后,劳动部门认定其为工伤。不料,该企业却将劳动部门推上被告席,要求法院撤销《工伤认定书》。人民法院受理此案后,援用我国《宪法》中公民享有人身自由权、居住自由权的规定,裁定该企业禁止员工外宿的规定违背了宪法精神,驳回了该企业的诉讼请求。由于此案在审判过程中把《宪法》作为裁决案件的直接依据,因而引起了法律界人士的极大关注…… Wang Denghui, a migrant worker, had a car accident on his way to get off work, but his company refused to pay medical expenses on the grounds that Wang Denghui violated the “Prohibition of Unauthorized Accommodation”. After Wang Denghui applied for labor arbitration, the labor department identified it as a work-related injury. Unexpectedly, the enterprise pushed the labor department onto the dock and asked the court to revoke the “work-related injury certificate.” After accepting the case, the people’s court availed itself of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China to enjoy the freedom of personal liberty and the right to freedom of residence. The ruling that the enterprise prohibited staff from sleeping outside of the hotel violated the spirit of the Constitution and rejected the claim of the enterprise. As the case brought the Constitution as the direct basis for adjudication in the trial process, it has drawn great attention from the legal profession ...