论文部分内容阅读
由 1 1年前发生在山东省的一起冒名上学事件引起的纠纷 ,给中国司法界出了一道不小的难题。 2 0 0 1年 8月 1 3日最高人民法院公布了专就此案作出的批复 ;同月 2 3日山东省高院直接引用宪法第 4 6条、最高人民法院批复和民事诉讼法有关规定 ,作出终审判决。齐玉苓案在社会各界尤其是法学界产生强烈反响并引发激烈争论 ,争论焦点涉及宪法和宪法学研究中的重要内容———宪法适用及相关问题。本文对齐玉苓案的性质、最高人民法院批复及山东省高院判决的性质和适当性、侵犯公民基本权利的主体等问题进行探讨 ,并展望了中国违宪审查制度的可能模式。
Disputes arising from a school-goat incident in Shandong Province 11 years ago have given China’s judiciary a serious problem. On August 13, 2001, the Supreme People’s Court announced its approval of the case; on the same month, the Shandong Provincial High Court directly referred to Article 46 of the Constitution, the Supreme People’s Court’s approval and the relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Law Final judgment. Qi Yuling case in all sectors of society, especially the legal profession had a strong reaction and triggered a heated debate, the debate focused on the constitution and constitutional law study an important part --- the application of the constitution and related issues. This article probes into the nature of Qi Yuling case, the approval of the Supreme People’s Court, the nature and suitability of the judgment of Shandong Provincial Higher People’s Court and the main body of infringing the basic rights of citizens. It also looks into the possible mode of China’s constitutional review system.