导言根据学科定义,经济学和地理学都关心农业活动的本质,经济学家因它创造财富,地理学家因地球表面对它的贡献。非地理学家关心农村地区广泛使用农学家和农业经济学家成果之后,能否取得成功。最近发表的第二次世界大战后的英国农业地理研究认为,地理学家的贡献是小的补充,并且怀疑地理学和农业经济学之间是寄生的,而不是共生的关系。在这种情况下,有一些可通过资源调查的效果来简单加以解释。这篇文章讨论 Introduction By definition, both economics and geography are concerned with the nature of agricultural activities, economists create wealth for it, and geographers contribute to it because of the Earth’s surface. Non-geographers are concerned with the success of the widespread use of agronomists and agricultural economists in rural areas. The recently published British Agricultural Geography Study after World War II argues that the contribution of geographers is a minor addition and suspects that parasitics, rather than symbiotic relationships, exist between geography and agricultural economics. In this case, some can be simply explained by the effect of the resource survey. This article discusses