论文部分内容阅读
[目的]了解南通市居民的健康素养知识水平,评价健康素养干预的效果。[方法]采用《2009中国公民健康素养调查问卷》,在干预前后分别对居民进行面对面入户调查。[结果]干预前后人们“对健康的理解”、“吸烟能导致冠心病、慢性阻塞性肺病、白内障和骨质疏松”、“癌症4个报警信号”和“煤气中毒”、“触电”和“农药中毒”急救的知晓率都有提高,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。[结论]本次干预方法总体有效,对健康素养知识水平的提高有一定的作用,为今后的健康教育与健康促进工作提供了基础数据和依据。
[Objective] To understand the health literacy level of Nantong residents and evaluate the effect of health literacy intervention. [Methods] Using “2009 Chinese Citizens’ Health Literacy Questionnaire”, the residents were interviewed face-to-face before and after the intervention. [Results] People ’s understanding of health before and after intervention, “Smoking can lead to coronary heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cataracts and osteoporosis”, “Four warning signs of cancer” and "Gas poisoning (P <0.05). The awareness rate of first aid was higher than that of first aid, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). [Conclusion] The intervention method is generally effective, which has a certain effect on improving the knowledge level of health literacy, and provides the basic data and basis for future health education and health promotion.