论文部分内容阅读
我看“删除《风筝》”事件大约两个月前,国内媒体就人教版初中语文教材删除鲁迅《风筝》一文展开争论,制造了一次不大不小的新闻事件。其实,有关鲁迅作品退出教材一事,已经不是个新鲜话题,过去就有数次争论,争来争去,变成各说各话,虽然最后某篇作品被删除成为事实,却并未达到成一致的、良性的意见。此次争鸣仍是老调重弹,新颖意见不多,反对删除的人说这是“忘记历史”、“教育的倒退”云云;赞同删除的人亦排列出数条理由,尝试归纳如下:筝》
About two months ago, the “media kite” incident that “deleted” the kite “” incident started controversy over the cancellation of the “Kite” by Lu Xun, the textbook for the PEP Junior High School textbooks, which created an infamous press event. Actually, it is no longer a fresh topic for Lu Xun’s work to quit its teaching materials. In the past, there were several controversies and controversies that turned each talk into words. Although the final piece of work was deleted as a fact, it did not reach a consensus , Benign opinion. The controversy is still the same old tune. There are not many new ideas. The people who oppose the deletion say it is “forgot history.” “The retrogression in education” and so on. The people who agree with the deletion also rank a few reasons for trying to conclude As follows: Zheng "