苏联维辛斯基外长於一九五二年十一月二十一日和十二月四日在联合国大会法律委员会上两次关於侵略定义的演说,构成了国际法上关於侵略问题的重要文献。制定“侵略”的明确的定义,是苏联二十年来外交上努力的一个目标。然而,直到今天,这种努力始终遭受着帝国主义集团的阻挠。为什麽苏联主张确定侵略定义?显然不是仅仅为了澄清一个学术上的概念。制定侵略定义的问题包含着一个重大的政治斗争。正如维辛斯基所说,这是“外交政策上的一个十分重要而尖锐的问题,是一个具有非常实际利益的问题。”自从苏联人民建立了自己的社会主义国家以来,它始终高举着和平的旗帜,反对侵略战争,自己不侵略别人,也不许别人侵略自己。要想实行这样一个政策,首先必须把侵略下一个定义,有了定义,全世界人民才可以清楚地看出来:谁是和平保卫者,谁是侵略者。这样一个定义,对於时时刻刻存着侵略野心的帝国主义集团,显然是非常不利的。越是糊里糊涂,越是是非不明,帝国主义就越可以混水摸鱼。它们的野心是无止境的,它们的行动,也是忍心害理的。因此,它们一贯反对制定侵 Speeches by the Soviet Foreign Minister Vyshinski on the definition of aggression on the Law Committee of the UN General Assembly on November 21 and December 4, 1952, formed important documents on the issue of aggression in international law. The explicit definition of “aggression” is a goal of the diplomatic efforts of the Soviet Union over the past 20 years. However, until today, such efforts have always been obstructed by imperialist groups. Why does the Soviet Union advocate the definition of aggression? Clearly not just to clarify an academic concept. The question of the definition of aggression contains a major political struggle. As Vyshinsky said, this is “a very important and acute issue in foreign policy and an issue of real practical interest.” Since the Soviet people established their own socialist country, it has always held high the peace The banner of opposition to the war of aggression, do not invade others, nor allow others to invade themselves. To implement such a policy, we must first define the next definition of aggression and make it clear to all the people in the world: who is the defender of peace and who is the aggressor. Such a definition is obviously very unfavorable to the imperialist clique in its aggressive ambitions. The more muddleheaded, the more the more they are not known, the more imperialist can fish in troubled waters. Their ambitions are endless and their actions are bearish. Therefore, they have always opposed the formulation of invasion