论文部分内容阅读
一、“桩景与根艺相结合“说法不妥贵刊94·l期第35页《桩景与根艺相结合》一文中“这一作品是桩景与根艺的结合,是一种新尝试(因低干已成为不动的自然根艺)一”的说法是经不起推敲的。应该说:自然的“根”只有与人的“艺”结合之后才能成为根艺,两者不可或缺。也就是说,自然的根干无论如何地“像”,也仅是自然物而不能称为根艺。例如,菊花石的天然花纹维妙维肖,但这还不是“艺”;某些树瘤酷似柿等果品,但这也不是
First, the ”combination of stakes and root art “ is not the right title 94.1 period p. 35 ”The combination of stakes and root art,“ a piece of paper ”This work is a combination of stakes and root art is a The new attempt (because of the low dry has become immortal root art) a “argument can not withstand scrutiny. It should be said that the ”root“ of nature can become the root art only when it is combined with the ”art“ of the people, and both are indispensable. That is to say, natural roots are ”natural“ anyway, but they are natural things and can not be called root art. For example, the natural patterns of chrysanthemum stone are subtle, but this is not yet ”art." Some of the tree bark resemble persimmons and other fruits, but neither is it