论文部分内容阅读
通过回顾相关研究,文章认为,区域政策只有在考虑到人员以及地方双重依赖时才可能达到预期目的。空间中性与空间干预政策争论的本质在于是否承认空间均衡模型。鉴于现实世界往往并不存在空间均衡,空间干预政策便成为了次优的选择。然而,空间干预政策实施中的公平与效率目标经常是冲突的,很有可能陷入“零和游戏”。基于空间中性与空间干预的视角,文章提出了中国当前的区域政策选择。
By reviewing the relevant studies, the article argues that regional policies can only achieve their intended goals when they take into account the double dependency of personnel and places. The essence of the controversial policy on space neutrality and space intervention lies in the recognition of the space equilibrium model. In view of the fact that there is often no spatial equilibrium in the real world, spatial intervention policies have become the second best choice. However, the goal of fairness and efficiency in the implementation of space intervention policies is often conflicting and is likely to fall into “zero-sum game.” Based on the perspective of spatial neutrality and spatial intervention, the article puts forward China’s current regional policy options.