论文部分内容阅读
《历史研究》創刊于1954年,到現在已經四年半了。在这四年半中间,《历史研究》發表了一些有一定价值的論文,介紹了一些史料,并展开了有关中国历史上一些重要问题的討論和批判了某些資产阶級历史学者的反动观点,所有这些都引起了历史学界的注意。但是《历史研究》也存在着一个严重的缺点,这就是“厚古薄今”。根据初步统計材料說明:《历史研究》从創刊到1958年第六期,共發表有关中国历史的文章199篇。其中除了兼論古今的兩篇以外,屬于古代史(1840年以前)的有144篇,屬于近代史(1840年—1919年)的有42篇,屬于現代史(1919年以后)的只有11篇。除了上述199篇以外,《历史研究》还發表
“Historical Research” was first published in 1954, it has been four and a half years now. During the past four and a half years, Historical Studies published a number of valuable papers, introduced some historical materials and started discussions on some important issues in Chinese history and criticized the reactionary reaction of some bourgeois historians All these have drawn the attention of historians. However, there is also a serious shortcoming of “historical research”, which is “pros and cons”. According to the preliminary statistics, “History Studies” published 199 articles on Chinese history from its publication to its sixth issue in 1958. Among them, besides the two articles of the past and the present, 144 belong to the ancient history (before 1840), 42 belong to the modern history (1840-1919), and only 11 belong to the modern history (after 1919) . In addition to the above 199 articles, “Historical Studies” is also published